Scientific Papers

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES


© CSR, 2008-2019
ISSN: 2306-3483 (Online), 2071-8330 (Print)

2.8
2019CiteScore
 
83nd percentile
Powered by  Scopus



Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)


Strike Plagiarism

Partners
  • General Founder and Publisher:

    SCImago Journal & Country Rank

  • Publishing Partners:

     


    The journal is co-financed in the years 2022-2024 by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Poland in the framework of the ministerial programme “Development of Scientific Journals” (RCN) on the basis of contract no. RCN/SN/0669/2021/1 


    University of Szczecin (Poland)

    Academy of Economic Studies in Bucharest (Romania)


     

    Széchenyi István University (Hungary)


     

  • Membership:

     

    Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

    CrossRef

     

Can public debt harm social development? Evidence from the Asian-Pacific region

Vol. 13, No 2, 2020

 

Le Thanh Tung

 

Faculty of Economics and Public Management,

Ho Chi Minh City Open University,

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

tung.lt@ou.edu.vn

ORCID 0000-0001-8487-2217

Can public debt harm social development? Evidence from the Asian-Pacific region

 

 

 

 

 

Abstract. This paper aims to investigate the effect of public debt on some social development indicators with a sample including 17 developing and emerging countries in the Asia-Pacific region over the period of 1980-2018. The panel regression method is applied with both fixed-effects and random-effects models. Our study finds that public debt has a negative impact on some main social development indicators of the economies. More specifically, public debt has a negative and significant effect on the growth rate of GDP per capita. Public debt also has a negative impact on domestic investment, however, the coefficients are not statistically significant. Besides, public debt has a positive and significant impact on the poverty rate. Although public debt has a negative impact on inequality, it seems that all income groups are poorer, so the reduction of inequality (denoted by the Gini index) is understandable. Finally, the panel Granger causal test points out that high rate of poverty seems to be a good reason to persuade governments to borrow more in the future. Following our result, policy makers need to be more careful when they use public debt as a common tool to support economic activities in the future.

 

Received: October, 2019

1st Revision: March, 2020

Accepted: May, 2020

 

DOI: 10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-2/4

 

JEL ClassificationF34, H63

Keywordspublic debt, GDP per capita, domestic investment, poverty, inequality, Gini, social development, Asia-Pacific region