Scientific Papers

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES


© CSR, 2008-2019
ISSN: 2306-3483 (Online), 2071-8330 (Print)

2.8
2019CiteScore
 
83nd percentile
Powered by  Scopus



Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)


Strike Plagiarism

Partners
  • General Founder and Publisher:

    SCImago Journal & Country Rank

  • Publishing Partners:

     

     

    The journal is co-financed in the years 2022-2024 by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Poland in the framework of the ministerial programme “Development of Scientific Journals” (RCN) on the basis of contract no. RCN/SN/0669/2021/1. Subsidy amount: 80 000 PLN.

     

     

    University of Szczecin (Poland)

     

    Academy of Economic Studies in Bucharest (Romania)

     

    Széchenyi István University (Hungary)

  • Membership:

     

    Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

    CrossRef

     

Total factor productivity dynamics and the artificial intelligence paradox: Evidence from long-memory analysis

Vol. 18, No 4, 2025

 

Marinko Škare

 

Juraj Dobrila University of Pula,

Croatia

mskare@unipu.hr

ORCID 0000-0001-6426-3692


Total factor productivity dynamics and the artificial intelligence paradox: Evidence from long-memory analysis

Małgorzata Porada-Rochoń

 

Institute of Economics and Finance,

University of Szczecin,

Poland

malgorzata.porada-rochon@usz.edu.pl

ORCID 0000-0002-3082-5682


Rozana Veselica Celić

 

Juraj Dobrila University of Pula,

Croatia

rozana.veselica.celic@unipu.hr

ORCID 0000-0002-0336-5932

 

 

 

Abstract. This paper investigates the artificial intelligence (AI) productivity paradox using total factor productivity (TFP) from 1890 to 2022 and fractional integration and long-memory econometric methods. We find that total factor productivity gains from AI investments may be delayed and diffuse nonlinearly, following long-memory patterns similar to those of previous technological revolutions, resulting in a paradox of long lags, not a lack of innovation. The average TFP growth rate (0.54%) in the AI era is the lowest of any post-war technological wave, with profoundly contradictory persistence measures from the GPH (d=1.730) and Local Whittle (d=0.133) estimators, reflecting fundamental uncertainty about the actual productivity of AI. We observe that the GPH estimator is consistent with the "J-curve" hypothesis of temporary slowdown before long-term gains. In contrast, the Local Whittle estimator suggests productivity effects that may be fleeting and easily commoditized. Cross-country heterogeneity in AI persistence patterns points to the role of local institutions, policies, and complementary investments in mediating the macroeconomic impact of AI. These results imply that the full productivity benefits of AI may be realized over very long-run horizons, providing policymakers and investors with necessary guidance on the timing and nature of the AI revolution. 

 

Received: December, 2024

1st Revision: February, 2025

Accepted: May, 2025

 

DOI: 10.14254/2071-8330.2025/18-4/11

 

JEL ClassificationM10, M15, C22, O47, O30

Keywordsartificial intelligence, productivity, long-memory, fractional integration, J-curve, AI paradox